In the event of a conflict between the IMC and referenced standards, which provisions apply?

In situations where there is a conflict between the International Mechanical Code (IMC) and referenced standards, the provisions of the IMC take precedence. This means that the code specifically outlines requirements and regulations that must be followed, even if the referenced standards might suggest something different.

The reason for this hierarchy is that the IMC is designed to establish uniformity and safety in mechanical installations and provide clear guidelines for compliance. The referenced standards are often meant to complement or provide additional detail to the code, but when a conflict arises, the IMC serves as the primary authority.

This principle supports the central role of the IMC in ensuring that all mechanical systems meet minimum safety and performance criteria, allowing for real-world application of the regulations that are intended to protect both public safety and welfare. The other options do not apply because they may either be secondary guidelines or vary based on local jurisdictions but do not take precedence over the IMC itself.