When authorized employees enforce the code, under what condition are they not held liable?

Authorized employees are typically not held liable when they are acting in good faith and without malice because this principle is rooted in the concept of protecting individuals who enforce regulations or codes in their roles. Good faith implies that the employees genuinely believe they are acting in accordance with the rules and regulations, performing their duties responsibly. Acting without malice suggests that there is no intent to harm or to act against someone's interests unfairly. This protection encourages employees to fulfill their duties without the fear of legal repercussions, thereby ensuring that codes and laws can be enforced effectively.

In contrast, conditions such as acting on a public complaint, having the code under revision, or needing confirmation from a legal authority do not necessarily provide immunity from liability. These situations could involve complexities or uncertainties that might not shield the employees from legal consequences if their actions are questioned or challenged.