When there is a conflict between a general requirement and a specific requirement, which requirement governs?

In scenarios where there is a conflict between a general requirement and a specific requirement, the specific requirement takes precedence. This is based on the principle that specific regulations or guidelines are designed to address particular situations more accurately than general rules. When there is overlap, the specific requirement is interpreted as being tailored to a specific context, providing clarity and direction, thereby ensuring safety or compliance in particular applications.

For example, in engineering and mechanical work, if a general requirement states certain safety standards, but a specific requirement provides more detailed safety measures for a particular type of equipment, adherence to the specific requirement is crucial to ensure the safety and functionality of that equipment. This approach is common across various industries and regulatory frameworks, emphasizing precision and context over broad statements.